In the corporate landscape, there are cases of unethical behavior that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a story of suspected unethical behavior that not only taints the reputation of a single manager but throws doubt over the firm’s standards .
Despite serious allegations , Collins has stayed unscathed, appearing untouched by the uproar surrounding him . How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? According to sources , Collins’ history of improper behavior was marked by infractions of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left team members disenchanted and customers perplexed.
During a leadership training program — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. Insiders suggest he spent company-sponsored junkets engaging in flirtatious behavior , a blatant disregard of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his household stayed oblivious .
But the indiscretions didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged improper use a great read of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breach of trust . His audacious engagement with Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including emojis ventia kerikeri to brag about extramarital affairs — reveals a character of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on repeated times during work time , despite his current marriage and her having a significant other. This flagrant misuse of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but led to familial breakdowns — causing a string of heartbreak that extended past the organizational context.
In what way can this behavior be permitted to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The response , it appears, originates in a concerning absence of supervision within the company . Issues have been raised , yet Collins continues unchecked .
This shortage of repercussions conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the firm can serve as a safeguard. It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , disheartens staff , and ultimately undermines the business’s ethics.